Hay, Fenical & Gustafson tested six pure secondary metabolites (five algal terpenoids plus aplysin from sea hares) at ~1% of Thalassia testudinum dry mass — within the range of natural yields (0.6–3%) — in paired field assays on reefs in Panama and Martinique (25–43 rope pairs per compound; Wilcoxon paired-sample tests) and laboratory assays with juvenile Diadema antillarum (8–19 pairs per assay) .
Elatol was the strongest deterrent (-60% fish, -86% urchin). Aplysin, structurally related to isolaurinterol, deterred neither herbivore. Most deterrence occurred after biting rather than via avoidance — only elatol-coated blades were bitten less often (45% vs 91% of controls showed scars; Fisher's Exact, P=.05) .
The cymopol result (+94% Diadema grazing despite fish deterrence) is the paper's most intellectually honest finding: the authors explicitly declined a coevolution interpretation because Cymopolia had never been reported at either assay site, showing appropriate restraint. They also demonstrated that pharmacological bioactivity screens failed as predictors — pachydictyol-A showed almost no lab bioactivity yet strongly deterred feeding, while bioactive stypotriol and aplysin diverged in field effects.
The authors themselves flag the main issues: juvenile urchins only (post-1983 die-off adults unavailable, n=20–24 reused across all six assays with possible carry-over effects they could not rigorously exclude); TLC-only qualitative verification of compound persistence (no quantitative post-assay concentration data); tests at a single concentration (1%); Diadema densities were ecologically unrepresentative post-mass-mortality; and generalization from six terpenoids is premature for structure-activity claims. None of these were resolved by later work in this paper, but the conservative paired design mitigates most concerns.
Know what changed, what holds up, and what remains uncertain. Every Friday. No ads.