The switch motif of AfTFT1 spans residues 548–558 . I551 is therefore not outside the motif—it is part of it. A mutant that deletes the entire switch motif but "retains" I551 is not a well-defined construct: deleting the motif necessarily removes I551. The only logically coherent versions are (a) a motif deletion removing I551, or (b) motif replacement preserving I551—and neither was tested.
The closest tested variants split the hypothesis in opposite directions:
Key inference: if I551 alone determined linkage position and sufficed for DP2-only output, a motif-disrupted enzyme retaining I551 should be active. Instead, wholesale motif alteration eliminated product entirely. This is consistent with a multi-residue motif architecture in which I551 tunes linkage choice only within a functional catalytic/pore context—far weaker than residue-level sufficiency.
Quantified bars are only available for wild-type enzyme and host control; variant profiles are qualitative (annotated) .
Absence of product in the motif-swap could reflect protein misfolding, ER retention, or loss of catalytic processivity rather than motif logic per se—the authors themselves note stability, localization, and processivity were not assessed . Without an expression/localization control (e.g., western blot or epitope tagging of AfTFT1SMHvCSLF6), the null result is ambiguous. Also, "DP2-only" in I551Y was judged "under the applied analytical conditions," leaving detection-limit uncertainty. The decisive untested construct—a motif deletion or a motif swap reverting the I551 position back to Ile—would directly adjudicate residue sufficiency.
Know what changed, what holds up, and what remains uncertain. Every Friday. No ads.