Mcfadden, Manton, and Fiolka exploit a geometric quirk of OPM: the optical transfer function (OTF) is tilted relative to the tertiary camera frame, leaving empty regions in the rectangular Fourier domain. Deliberate axial under-sampling shifts OTF copies into these voids without overlap, so aliased information can be recovered by concatenating three copies of the dataset in kz and applying a binary mask—no interpolation, sub-pixel shifts, or spectral unmixing required .
Support is empirically solid but narrow: bead PSFs (100 nm on coverslip; 500 nm in agarose, 1800–2000 beads per condition for axial-resolution quantification) and one live-cell application (OMP25-GFP U2OS mitochondria at ~2 Hz). The heuristic stopping criterion—axial resolution degradation once OTF copies touch—is empirical, not derived from first principles, and the top-hat mask may introduce sinc ringing the authors acknowledge but do not quantify .
A follow-up preprint proposes Richardson-Lucy deconvolution as an alternative that reportedly outperforms this Fourier-stitching approach at 4–8× under-sampling, implying this method may not be the last word on OPM aliasing recovery . Blind spots here: only one tilt angle (45°) and two systems tested; behavior with noise, photobleaching, or non-ellipsoidal OTFs is untested; the claim of being "loss-less" rests on visual artifact absence rather than quantitative resolution/SNR metrics for the live-cell data.
A clever, simple, well-motivated speed optimization with immediate practical value for OPM/SCAPE users (lower photodamage, less data). Confidence: moderate—internal evidence is consistent, but independent replication and quantitative comparisons with deconvolution approaches are pending.
Code and example data are openly available (GitHub; data).
Know what changed, what holds up, and what remains uncertain. Every Friday. No ads.