Quickly verify claims by accessing the underlying experimental data and figures.
Press Enter β΅ to solve
Fuel Your Discoveries
"Science is not only a disciple of reason but, also, one of romance and passion."
- Stephen Hawking
Quick Explanation
Copied
Fumosorinone (Fumos) is reported as a Shp2-selective small-molecule inhibitor
Key evidence presented: recombinant PTP inhibition (Shp2 IC50 ~6.31 ΞΌM; weaker effects vs several other PTPs), direct binding by SPR (reported Shp2 KD ~40 nM for WT; reduced ~368 nM for Shp2 Y279A), noncompetitive kinetics, and pathway effects in human cells consistent with Shp2 acting upstream of Ras/ERK signaling, plus reduced invasion-associated Src/Paxillin phosphorylation.
Evidence source:
Long Explanation
Paper Review (Rigorous & Skeptical): βDiscovery of a Novel Inhibitor of the Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase Shp2β
Primary reference:10.1038/srep17626 (Scientific Reports, Dec 02 2015)
Overall claim (as stated by authors): Fumosorinone is a potent, reported Shp2 inhibitor with selectivity over several other PTPs, binds directly to Shp2 (SPR), modulates EGFβRas/ERK signaling (and Gab1βShp2 association), leaves Ras-independent ERK activation (PMA and oncogenic Ras contexts) largely intact, and correlates with reduced Src/Paxillin phosphorylation and invasion.
Source:
Selectivity (In vitro PTP IC50s)
Evidence traceability: The IC50 values shown above are directly taken from the paperβs Table 1.
Direct Binding (SPR KD)
Critical interpretation: The paper uses a single point mutation (Y279A) as mechanistic validation for predicted binding interactions.
However, because the authors also state Y279A βdid not show any enzyme activityβ (reported in Table 1 and kinetic context), there is an intrinsic difficulty in separating βbinding-site specificityβ from βloss of correct catalytic architecture/structureβ effects.
Full-length vs Isolated PTP Domain
Mechanistic claim (as authors frame it): The paper interprets the lower potency against full-length Shp2 as interference from the N-SH2 autoinhibitory interaction with the catalytic domain, suggesting Fumos may preferentially inhibit activated Shp2.
Mechanistic wiring diagram (as proposed)
Important: This is the mechanism diagram as presented/argued by the authors; it is not a fully independent causal proof of direct pathway wiring. The paperβs own discussion notes controversies about the precise Shp2βRas mechanism.
Skeptical critique: what is strong vs what remains uncertain
Strengths (within what the paper explicitly shows)
Multi-layer target evidence: biochemical inhibition (IC50 panel) + direct binding (SPR KD) + mechanistic mutational association (Y279A binding shift) + cellular pathway modulation consistent with upstream Shp2 control.
Selectivity is empirically addressed at the level of an in vitro PTP panel (though panel size is limited vs the full PTP family).
Pathway specificity logic: authors argue pathway upstream positioning by showing inhibition of EGF-induced ERK/Ras and Gab1βShp2 association, while not blocking PMA-induced ERK1/2 and not inhibiting ERK activation in constitutively active Ras contexts.
Major uncertainties / red flags (explicitly worth testing later)
Limited assay breadth for selectivity and lack of a wider off-target enzymatic panel.
Y279A is both a binding-importance probe and a catalytic-activity loss probe, complicating interpretation of βbinding vs conformational disruption.β
Noncompetitive conclusion is based on LineweaverβBurk fitting, which can be sensitive to experimental noise and model assumptions.
Cellular readouts are partly correlative for phenotypes like invasion: reduced invasion is paired with signaling changes, but causality is not fully established within the paperβs excerpt.
No in vivo efficacy / PK-Tox validation is shown in the provided full text; translational relevance remains unknown.
Raw extracted quantitative panel (from paper tables/text)
Assay module
Target / condition
Reported metric
Value
In vitro PTP inhibition
Shp2 PTP domain
IC50 (ΞΌM)
6.31 Β± 0.52
In vitro PTP inhibition
PTP1B
IC50 (ΞΌM)
14.04 Β± 0.60
In vitro PTP inhibition
TCPTP
IC50 (ΞΌM)
29.65 Β± 0.42
In vitro PTP inhibition
SHP1
IC50 (ΞΌM)
34.70 Β± 0.37
In vitro PTP inhibition
Selected other PTPs
IC50 (ΞΌM)
> 100 (assay ceiling reported)
In vitro PTP inhibition
Shp2 full-length
IC50 (ΞΌM)
26.52 Β± 0.37
SPR binding
Shp2 WT
KD (nM)
40
SPR binding
Shp2 Y279A
KD (nM)
368
Source for table values:
Methods clarity & reproducibility assessment (based on provided full text)
Enzyme assay setup is described (buffer composition, pH, substrate pNPP, 96-well format, incubation conditions), which improves reproducibility.
SPR instrument and regeneration protocol are named, supporting technical reproducibility.
Statistics are described (one-way ANOVA + Tukey; p<0.01 threshold), but the excerpt does not show full effect-size reporting for every panel.
Explore further on BGPT
Author Reviews on BGPT
Feedback:
Updated: April 07, 2026
BGPT Paper Review
Study Novelty
80%
The work is novel mainly in the reported natural-product discovery-to-target engagement pipeline for Shp2 using fumosorinone, with direct binding (SPR) plus signaling-pathway disruption presented as consistent with upstream Shp2 function. Source:
Scientific Quality
70%
Quality is bolstered by triangulation (IC50 panel + SPR + cellular signaling logic), but is limited by (i) reliance on a relatively narrow PTP panel, (ii) kinetic classification from LineweaverβBurk, (iii) interpretability complications from Y279A losing enzyme activity, and (iv) no in vivo PK/efficacy/tox evidence in the provided text. Source:
Study Generality
60%
The studyβs mechanistic scope is centered on Fumos and limited cell models, so general conclusions about Shp2 inhibition class-wide are more limited than scaffold-independent mechanistic insights. Source:
Study Usefulness
70%
Useful as a lead/starting point and for mapping Shp2-dependent signaling nodes (EGFRβGab1βShp2βRas/ERK; Src/Paxillinβinvasion) with reported biochemical and binding parameters. Source:
Study Reproducibility
70%
Methods give sufficient detail for biochemical/SPR/cell workflows (buffer recipes, substrate, incubation conditions, SPR timings and regeneration buffer; stats approach). Uncertainty remains around full compound characterization and comprehensive panel reporting in the excerpted portion. Source:
Explanatory Depth
70%
Depth is moderate: the paper provides a mechanistic hypothesis supported by docking + Tyr279-dependent binding change and signaling readouts, but acknowledges controversy in the Shp2βRas mechanism and does not fully establish direct causal links for all downstream phenotypes. Source:
Ingest IC50 panel and SPR KD values from the paper text you provided, then compute selectivity fold-changes and generate publication-style plots and a tidy summary table.
Get emailed when your analysis is done!
We'll email you the results when your analysis is finished.
Hypothesis Graveyard
A single-compound selectivity claim may be a misattribution: if Fumos binds broadly across many PTPs in cellular lysates, the downstream βShp2-specificβ pathway effects would persist even in Shp2 loss-of-function models. Why itβs weaker now: the paper demonstrates in vitro selectivity over a panel and SPR direct Shp2 binding, but the lack of broader cellular target-occupancy checks leaves this still plausible. Source:
The noncompetitive mechanism could be an artifact of LineweaverβBurk interpretation: if global nonlinear regression of MichaelisβMenten parameters yields a different inhibition model, the mechanistic kinetic classification would need revision. Why itβs weaker now: authors report Km unaffected and Vmax decreased plus reversibility, but LineweaverβBurk can be sensitive. Source: