Why BGPT?
logo

Traceable Claims in Bioinformatics

See what computational analyses actually reported, with provenance for every claim.Know what the science actually supports before you trust the answer.

Press Enter ↡ to search claims



    Explore by Goal












     Quick Explanation


    MolluscaGenes
    A phylum-wide, molluscan-optimized transcriptomic resource that unifies 299 molluscan transcriptomes and provides 196 HMMs for identifying protein familiesβ€”used here to resolve the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) superfamily into 15 clades, including lineage-specific expansions.
    Primary source:



     Long Explanation


    MolluscaGenes (what it is, what it contains, how to use it)
    MolluscaGenes is a centralized, molluscan-optimized transcriptomic database that unifies 299 molluscan species across all eight recognized molluscan classes, standardizes assembly/annotation, and provides molluscan-optimized HMMs to detect protein families more reliably across diverse molluscs.
    Key scale & outputs (from the paper’s reported dataset)
    • 299 molluscan species; distribution across classes is explicitly reported.
    • 17,000,000 protein sequences (reported total), with assembly-scale summaries reported.
    • 196 molluscan-optimized HMMs for protein family identification.
    • Demonstration case: the nAChR superfamily includes 3,586 sequences from >190 species, resolved into 15 monophyletic clades.
    Figure 1 β€” MolluscaGenes class coverage (species counts)
    Source for counts: MolluscaGenes dataset description.
    Figure 2 β€” nAChR clade abundance (reported major clade counts)
    Source: MolluscaGenes nAChR clade counts for the major clades.
    Figure 3 β€” β€œLab-scale reality check” on validation scale (HMM validation)
    The paper describes validation as comparison against six held-out molluscan proteomes; this figure shows which proteomes were used, avoiding unreported numeric performance.
    How MolluscaGenes works (pipeline logic, without hand-waving)
    1. Unify molluscan input: the resource integrates transcriptomic data from 299 molluscan species across 8 classes, using raw reads from NCBI SRA and pre-assembled transcriptomes referenced in the pipeline.
    2. Standardize assembly & reduce redundancy: reads are quality-controlled, de novo assembled, and redundancy reduced; BUSCO is used to filter transcriptomes to increase completeness consistency.
    3. Annotate proteins & functional domains: the paper describes functional annotation steps including BLAST/InterProScan/eggNOG-mapper style approaches.
    4. Build molluscan-optimized HMMs: specialized HMMs (via TIAMMAt) are generated for protein-family identification, then applied to resolve the nAChR superfamily into 15 clades.
    What the nAChR case study specifically claims (and what remains uncertain)
    Known from the paper’s results
    • The nAChR superfamily is resolved into 15 monophyletic clades, including lineage-specific expansions.
    • Chemotactile receptor (CR) and CR-like clades show cephalopod enrichment, while CR-like sequences show broad distribution suggesting an ancestral molluscan origin with later cephalopod neofunctionalization.
    Critical uncertainty & limitations (explicitly acknowledged by the paper)
    • Transcriptome-only limitation: absence of a transcript does not prove gene absence; tissue/stage specificity can cause false negatives.
    • No synteny / genome structure: transcriptome data do not resolve genome organization or distinguish duplication mechanisms from assembly artifacts.
    • Taxon/tissue unevenness: uneven sampling across classes and unknown differences in sampling depth can bias clade composition estimates.
    • Reporting incompleteness risk: the paper mentions a placeholder β€˜XXXX’ for a statistic in the text, which is a direct reproducibility/clarity concern for at least that value.
    Where to access it
    Access links are stated by the paper.
    Concept map β€” β€œdatabase resource β†’ protein family detection β†’ evolutionary clade structure”
    The conceptual links are grounded in the paper’s pipeline description and results: dataset unification, HMM creation, application to nAChR clades, and explicit limitations around transcriptome inference.
    Next science actions (click to go deeper in BGPT)
    If you want, the agent can further transform MolluscaGenes’ reported outputs into additional comparative figures/tables and extract what is testable vs uncertain from the provided descriptions.


    Feedback:    

    Updated: June 08, 2026

     Top Data Sources ExportMCP


     Analysis Wizard



    Builds a clade-count table and plots class distribution plus major nAChR clade counts from MolluscaGenes’ reported summary statistics, then exports a downloadable figure for your report.



     Hypothesis Graveyard


    β€œCR-like diversity means CR evolved from multiple independent origins rather than a single ancestral lineage.” Likely weaker because the paper frames broad CR-like distribution as compatible with ancestral molluscan origin plus cephalopod neofunctionalization, so multiple independent origins is not the default explanation in their argument.


    β€œAll nAChR clades are conserved across molluscs equally.” This is contradicted by the paper’s reported monophyletic 15-clade structure with lineage-specific expansions and class-enriched patterns (e.g., cephalopod enrichment for CR).

     Science Art


    molluscagenes Science Art

     Science Movie


    Make a narrated HD Science movie for this answer ($32 per minute)




     Discussion


    Stay current without chasing every paper.

    Know what changed, what holds up, and what remains uncertain. Every Friday. No ads.


    My BGPT






     Trending