Why BGPT?
logo

Review Papers Faster

Check each claim against its linked experiments, results, and falsification criteria.Know what the science actually supports before you trust the answer.

Press Enter ↡ to check claims


     Quick Explanation



    Verdict: This rigorous 2001 Journal of Virology study demonstrates that adding a single N-glycosylation sequon (N291-KT) to human aminopeptidase N (hAPN/CD13) blocks HCoV-229E binding and infection, while revertants removing that sequon restore receptor function, yet removal of the N818 glycosylation site alone does not convert hAPN into a receptor for porcine (TGEV) or feline (FECoV) coronaviruses .


     Long Explanation



    Core evidence. Site-directed mutagenesis of hAPN in non-permissive murine CMT93 cells showed that six substitutions (p6-hAPN) introducing an N291 glycosylation sequon abolished HCoV-229E receptor activity, while single revertants (E291KT or N291KQ) removing the sequon restored infection, with radiolabeled-virus binding dropping from 100% (wt) to 3.1% (p6-hAPN) and 17.4% (N291KT) . Comparable surface expression (FACS-sorted) and preserved enzymatic/antibody-epitope profiles argue the effect reflects glycan-mediated steric hindrance of virus binding, not misfolding or trafficking defects.

    Counter-evidence and boundary conditions the authors addressed. Removing a second, non-conserved sequon (N818E) did not confer TGEV or FECoV receptor activity on hAPN, and the authors themselves note that removing the analogous N286 sequon from pAPN also fails to confer HCoV-229E susceptibility . The paper therefore qualifies its own headline: glycosylation modulates, but does not alone determine, species specificity.

    Critical assessment. Reported observations are internally consistent and multiply triangulated (IFA, immunoblot, virus titers, direct binding), a strength. However, all work is in overexpressing cell lines; glycosylation occupancy at N291 was inferred from phenotypes (partial IFA positivity for N291KT suggests incomplete occupancy) rather than directly mapped glycans, and no structural evidence localizes the true spike-binding site . What would change the conclusion: direct glycoproteomic proof that N291 is glycosylated in vivo on respiratory epithelium, or a structurally resolved spike–APN complex showing direct contact at 288–295.

    Context. CD13 is a multifunctional moonlighting enzyme with diverse tissue-specific expression , and receptor surface density itself is environmentally tunableβ€”e.g., lowered extracellular pH increases HL60 CD13 surface content ~60–70% without mRNA change β€”both relevant caveats when extrapolating this in vitro host-range work to tissue tropism in vivo.



    Feedback:    

    Updated: October 26, 2026

     BGPT Paper Review



    Study Novelty

    80%

    First demonstration that receptor N-linked glycosylation modulates serogroup 1 coronavirus species specificity; glycan effects on viral attachment proteins were known, but receptor-side glycan control of host range was novel in 2001.



    Scientific Quality

    80%

    Multiple orthogonal assays (binding, IFA, immunoblot, titer), FACS-matched expression controls, enzymatic/epitope checks, and honest qualification (N818 null result) make this strong mechanistic work; deduct small points for inference of glycosylation occupancy without direct glycan mapping and no structural localization.



    Study Generality

    70%

    Principles extend to other virus-receptor systems (CAT-1/MuLV parallel), but conclusions are bounded to serogroup 1 coronaviruses and hAPN/pAPN/fAPN comparisons.



    Study Usefulness

    80%

    Directly informs host-range determinants, tropism, and design of receptor-mutagenesis experiments; contributed conceptual groundwork later used for coronavirus receptor studies.



    Study Reproducibility

    90%

    Full primer sequences, cloning strategy, cell lines, FACS sort criteria, and assay parameters reported; constructs described precisely.



    Explanatory Depth

    80%

    Mechanistic causal chain (glycan addition β†’ binding blockade β†’ infection loss) is well supported at the cellular level, though the atomic-scale binding site and glycan structure remain inferred.


    🎁 Authors: Collect 500 Free Science Tokens (β‰ˆ $50.0 USD)

    Claim My Author Tokens

    Use for 125 days of free BGPT access (4 tokens = 1 day) or trade/sell (β‰ˆ $50.0 USD)

     Top Data Sources ExportMCP



     Analysis Wizard



    Aligning hAPN, pAPN, and fAPN sequences to locate all NX(S/T) glycosylation sequons and map evolutionary conservation at residues 288–295 and 818–820.



     Hypothesis Graveyard



    HCoV-229E spike binds directly to hAPN residues 288–295: falsified by revertant dataβ€”mutants with 5 non-conservative substitutions in 288–295 retain receptor function once the N291 sequon is removed, so 288–295 acts indirectly via glycosylation rather than as the contact surface.

     Science Art


    Paper Review: Molecular Determinants of Species Specificity in the Coronavirus Receptor Aminopeptidase N (CD13): Influence of N-Linked Glycosylation Science Art

     Science Movie



    Make a narrated HD Science movie for this answer ($64 per minute)




     Discussion


    Stay current without chasing every paper.

    Know what changed, what holds up, and what remains uncertain. Every Friday. No ads.


    My BGPT