Why BGPT?
logo

The Evidence Layer for Scientific AI

Ask questions across claims linked to experiments, exact results, limitations, and sources.Know what the science actually supports before you trust the answer.

Press Enter ↡ to search evidence


     Quick Explanation



    Jacob E. Corn is a world-class genome-editing scientist: OpenAlex attributes to him ~166 works, >16,100 citations, and an h-index of 52 driven by high-impact tool papers such as Rosetta3, asymmetric donor DNA HDR engineering, and CRISPR repression libraries, plus recent first/later-author work on ADP-ribosylation append editing . The supplied Semantic Scholar profile (h-index 2, 16 citations, 5 papers) is almost certainly a fragmented identity record and should not be used to judge his scientific strength.


     Long Explanation



    Core Scientific Track Record

    Jacob E. Corn's publication record spans structural/computational biology (Rosetta3, RosettaScripts, computationally designed influenza binders), CRISPR methodology (asymmetric donor DNA HDR enhancement, CRISPRi/a library design, nanoparticle RNP delivery), translational editing (selection-free correction of the sickle mutation in human HSPCs), and current genome-editing chemistry. OpenAlex attributes 166 works and 16,114 citations with an h-index of 52 to his ORCID record, with citation intensity rising steadily since 2012 and peaking at ~1,600+/year in 2020–2026.

    His recent first-class work includes a DarT2-nCas9 "append editor" that adds targeted DNA ADP-ribosylation as a distinct editing modality, rigorously dissected across nine genetic backgrounds in E. coli showing RecA dependence, with cross-kingdom outcomes in yeast, plants, and human cells . His group also built a systems-scale phosphosite-function predictor validated experimentally at four sites (PPM1G S201/S183, KHSRP S125/S274), with deposited code and BioStudies data . Earlier lab contributions (modified gRNA/donor DNA platform enabling gDonor conjugates and fluorescent donor enrichment, ~8% HDR via polymer delivery) show the same method-driven, engineer-first orientation .

    Citation Metrics: A Discrepancy to Flag

    The supplied Semantic Scholar author record (h-index 2, 16 citations, 5 papers) conflicts with the OpenAlex record (h-index 52, >16,000 citations) and lists unrelated titles, indicating an author-disambiguation failure rather than genuine output. Judging Corn by that fragment would invert reality; the OpenAlex trajectory, top works (Rosetta3 ~1,945 citations; asymmetric donor DNA ~1,127; CRISPRi/a libraries ~896), and co-authorship with Doudna, Baker, Baltimore, and Church are mutually consistent and credible. A minor caveat: many landmark works are multi-author collaborations where Corn is middle/last author, so some citation mass reflects team science.

    Rigor, Novelty, and Blind Spots

    Evidence quality is strong across extracted records: controlled catalytic-dead variants, systematic repair-gene knockouts, multi-organism validation, and deposited data/code recur in his papers. Limitations flagged by the records themselves include motif constraints and DarT2 cytotoxicity for append editing, sparse phosphoproteomics coverage (~8,300 of ~189,576 sites per perturbation), and mostly cell-line models with limited in vivo validation . Declared industry roles (Serac co-founder/SAB; SAB roles at Relation Therapeutics, Hornet Bio, Kano; collaborations with Allogene and Cimeio) are transparently disclosed and warrant awareness of commercial-incentive bias when evaluating translational claims . Overall, the evidence supports a top-tier, method-defining scientist whose weakest exposed flank is translational/clinical validation depth rather than conceptual rigor.



    Feedback:    

    Updated: November 12, 2026

     BGPT Author Review



    Scientific Quality

    90%

    The OpenAlex record (166 works, ~16,114 citations, h-index 52, sustained >1,400 citations/year since 2020) plus first-class methodological outputs (append editing with clean genetic-dependence controls; phosphosite ML with experimental validation; modified gRNA/donor DNA platform) justify a top-tier score. The Semantic Scholar fragment (h-index 2) is an obvious identity-split artifact and was discounted. Minor deductions: heavy reliance on collaboration-derived citation mass, cell-line-dominant validation, and motif/toxicity constraints in the newest technology.



    Communication Quality

    80%

    Papers consistently pair mechanisms with usable tools (web apps, deposited code, source data), aiding dissemination; multi-organism presentation in append editing is clear and logically ordered. Deductions because communication quality of talks/figures could not be directly assessed from supplied extracts, and some work depends on dense multi-omics methods that raise reader burden.



    Author Novelty

    80%

    Repeatedly opens new modalities rather than incrementally extending: ADP-ribosylation append editing as a chemically distinct editing axis, gRNA-donor conjugates, phosphosite-function prediction for the dark phosphoproteome. Not a perfect 10 because base/prime editing context and CRISPR-delivery improvements build on established frameworks.



    Scientific Rigor

    90%

    Extracted records show catalytic-dead controls, knockout panels across nine repair genes, triplicate biological replicates, deposited sequencing data, and explicit limitation sections (motif constraints, TARG1 dependence, off-target ADPr risk). Deduction for in-vivo validation gaps and undisclosed replicate counts in the 2017 eLife platform paper.

     Top Data Sources ExportMCP



     Hypothesis Graveyard



    EGFR copy-number screening as a surrogate for EGFR mutation testing (as examined in a related 2014 SISH cohort): falsified by low sensitivity and positive predictive value in 96 resected adenocarcinomas.


    Universal synergy of EGFR kinase inhibition with ligand-blocking antibodies: the kinetic model predicted negative synergy for all gefitinib-cetuximab combinations because their determinants converge on the same phosphorylation endpoint.

     Science Art


    Author Review: Jacob E Corn Science Art

     Science Movie



    Make a narrated HD Science movie for this answer ($64 per minute)




     Discussion


    Stay current without chasing every paper.

    Know what changed, what holds up, and what remains uncertain. Every Friday. No ads.


    My BGPT