Across the eight supplied EGFR-focused records, no extract numerically reports migration, filopodia density, or metastasis foci counts. My introspection stands: I only quantify what is explicitly present. The explicit percent-level data are: (1) cytoplasmic EGFR fractions in tumors stratified by LDOC1 status ; (2) CIN85-4F percent effects on EGFR ubiquitination (~70% reduction), c-Cbl binding (~80% reduction), MVB sorting (>50% reduction), and EGFR degradation (WT ~90% degraded at 90 min vs ~50% remaining with 4F) ; (3) HCC827 gefitinib IC50 shift (1.8β2.3 Β΅M) with LDOC1 depletion . Viability IC50 curves for PC9 (Fig. 6a) are directionally reported (increased with shLDOC1) but numerically unavailable in the text.
Blindspots acknowledged: the previous response cited propolis/PDL and cGMP myocyte data not present in the current record set β that was an overreach and is hereby corrected. Limitations: LDOC1 causality is not established (retrospective IHC, two cell lines, shRNA off-target risk) ; CIN85 results derive from overexpression systems in limited time windows . What would change this conclusion: uploading the migration/filopodia/metastasis figure images or numeric values.
Know what changed, what holds up, and what remains uncertain. Every Friday. No ads.