Well-referenced, mechanistic review that persuasively connects kallikreinβkinin proteolysis, GPCR kinin signaling (B2R constitutive; B1R inducible), and immunothrombosis across viruses, bacteria and parasites, but limited by heavy reliance on mouse/ in vitro models and sparse direct human in vivo data β the review is a useful synthesis and hypothesis-generator rather than definitive proof of causation in human infections
Key supporting experimental exemplars: immunothrombosis conceptual framework (Engelmann & Massberg 2013), B2R role in DC-driven Th1 responses (Monteiro et al. 2007).
Visualize first, explain second β key quantitative/qualitative judgements paired with sources and an interactive metric chart.
The review often frames KKS/B2R as broadly protective via immunothrombosis and DC activation, but the net effect is context-dependent β the same pathways that trap microbes can also drive pathologic edema, hemorrhage, or exacerbate chronic fibrosis (e.g., potential B1R role in chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy); assertions that inhibiting FXII/PK will be uniformly beneficial are premature without cell-specific and host-stage experiments
This 2017 review is a rigorous, well-documented synthesis that correctly highlights kinins and GPCR kinin receptors as central integrators of proteolytic, coagulation and immune circuits in infection. Its novelty lies in stitching disparate literatures into the immunothrombosis/kinin axis framework. However, key translational steps remain: (1) cell-specific causal tests using conditional genetics, (2) standardized human biomarker studies, and (3) multi-model therapeutic trials that evaluate host defense trade-offs before clinical targeting of KKS components. Confidence in these assessments is moderate-high given the breadth of experimental support in animals/cell systems but low for immediate human translation without further data.
Custom summaries of the latest cutting edge Science research. Every Friday. No Ads.