Watts, Morrison, Davis, and Barman deliver the definitive systematic integration of 5-HT's cardiovascular actions, organized tissue-by-tissue (blood, vasculature, heart, kidney, adrenal, CNS) with receptor-level pharmacology (). Three mechanistic pillars emerge: (1) vascular contraction via 5-HT2A and relaxation via 5-HT2B/7 create context-dependent net tone; (2) central circuits show subtype-divergent outcomesβ5-HT1A reduces sympathetic drive, 5-HT2A raises itβso net effect depends on receptor access; (3) a striking, underexplored finding that one-week subcutaneous 5-HT infusion nearly normalizes DOCA-salt rat blood pressure (>50 mmHg drop), an effect abolished by the NOS inhibitor L-NNA ().
Clinical context. The review connects serotonergic drug classes to divergent BP outcomes: TCAs/MAOIs commonly cause orthostatic hypotension, SNRIs (e.g., sibutramine, withdrawn 2010) tend to raise BP, and fluoxetine shows bidirectional effects across speciesβconfounded by SERT/NET promiscuity and off-target potassium-channel blockade (). Complementary human evidence shows fluoxetine amplifies counterregulatory autonomic responses (epinephrine 5065β8187 pmol/l; MSNA 13β19 bursts/min during hypoglycemia), reinforcing that SSRIs modulate sympathetic outflow in vivo ().
Strengths: exhaustive scope (431 references), explicit acknowledgment of species confounds, and honest identification of unresolved questions (BBB crossing, NOS locus, thermoregulation-BP coupling). Limitations: as a narrative review it is vulnerable to citation/selection bias; rodent-to-human extrapolation is weak given that human IV 5-HT produced variable or no BP change in the very studies tabulated (). The long-term antihypertensive claim rests largely on the authors' own infusion experiments with nβ€4 per group; no mechanism beyond 'somewhere NOS is involved' is localized. Historical human data from 1957 already showed BP responses to IV serotonin were heterogeneous across subjects ()βa blind spot the review does not fully reconcile with the rodent depressor narrative. Notably, the review addresses common critique points (species variability, transporter promiscuity) itself rather than omitting them.
Know what changed, what holds up, and what remains uncertain. Every Friday. No ads.