This landmark 1978 study fingerprinted Ti plasmids from ~25 Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains using the SmaI restriction endonuclease, after genetically isolating pure Ti plasmids via in planta conjugation or transformation into single-plasmid recipients (A136/A200) . Three classes emerged:
Strengths: The genetic purification strategy (excluding RP4-carrying two-plasmid conjugants) was rigorous; authors candidly note SmaI fingerprints miss small homologous regions when fragments exceed the homology size and that "common fragment" calls require hybridization confirmation .
Blindspots: Single-enzyme resolution cannot detect distant homology (the authors concede this); the null-type class rests on n=1; strain 223's two-plasmid content corrects an earlier report, showing contour-length measurements alone can mislead. Later work showed fingerprint similarity poorly predicts functional relatednessβvir genes are conserved across plasmid types despite divergent fingerprints , and the supervirulent pTiBo542 shares >95% vir-region homology with pTiA6 .
This work prefigured plasmid molecular epidemiology and underpinned the Ti-plasmid engineering that made Agrobacterium the workhorse of plant transformation . The observation that octopine plasmids seldom co-occur with cryptic plasmids while nopaline plasmids frequently do remains an open evolutionary question the authors themselves flagged.
Know what changed, what holds up, and what remains uncertain. Every Friday. No ads.