A synapse converts an electrical signal in the presynaptic neuron to a chemical signal (neurotransmitter) that binds postsynaptic receptors, producing excitation or inhibition; presynaptic protein assemblies (e.g., Munc13/Munc18/SNAREs) dock and prime vesicles for Ca2+-triggered fusion, while postsynaptic receptor composition (AMPAR/GABAA) determines response type and strength
This timeline is a qualitative schematic of the canonical steps: presynaptic AP β voltage-gated Ca2+ entry β Ca2+-sensing machinery triggers SNARE-mediated fusion β transmitter released β postsynaptic receptors (e.g., AMPA, NMDA, GABAA) transduce chemical signal into postsynaptic current (excitation or inhibition). Core molecular evidence below.
Structural/functional evidence: Munc13 oligomers template multiple SNAREpins and are required for efficient docking/priming and fast Ca2+-triggered release β cryoET + reconstitution + in vivo genetics supports this templating model and shows that disrupting Munc13 interfaces reduces SNARE assembly and release probability
The inhibitory concentrations (IC50) reported experimentally support that interfering with phosphoinositide metabolism and/or Ca2+ signaling reduces evoked transmitter release (neomycin IC50 ~0.5 mM for K+-evoked, ~0.65 mM for veratridine-evoked) β original measurements from rat brain slices and synaptosomes
Postsynaptic response depends on receptor composition: AMPARs (fast depolarizing), NMDARs (voltage-dependent, Ca2+-permeable when GluR2 absent/edited state matters), and GABAA (fast Clβ mediated inhibition); AMPAR assembly and calcium permeability are strongly influenced by GluR2 Q/R editing which controls tetramerization and ER exit
Selected sources used (inline above): Munc13 templating study (2025), AMPAR Q/R editing (2003), neomycin inhibition (1987), GABAA dynamics review (2008). See inline citation tags for full extracts.
Know what changed, what holds up, and what remains uncertain. Every Friday. No ads.