Why BGPT?
logo

Graphs Built From Reported Results

Turn exact figures reported in papers into graphs, each point traced to its source.Know what the science actually supports before you trust the answer.

Press Enter ↡ to create graph


     Long Response



    TCR Diversity Metrics β€” Visual Comparison Across Published datasets

    Visual first β€” compact captions and precise citations below each figure. All claims are drawn only from the listed publications; each data point is cited.

    Notes: the HNSCC single-cell spatial study reported a very large total of unique TCRΞ² CDR3 sequences across samples (raw unique sequences aggregated across patients); TCRMatch used curated IEDB-derived sets; TCR2HLA reports cohort scale (individuals) used to train classifiers; TCRanalyzer sample count reflects number of sequenced samples in that methods paper.

         

    These medians come from the systematic assessment of bulk TCR-Seq methodological choices; the authors reported median clonotype counts for TRA and TRB across their RNA-based libraries.

    Context: TCR-L reports median unique TCR sequences per TCGA SKCM patient derived from RNA-seq; Platypus example datasets were small single-cell PBMC cohorts (<10,000 cells total) used for single-cell integration demonstrations; TCRMatch additionally evaluated an independent 10x dataset of 15,769 CDR3Ξ² sequences.

       

    AlphaFold3 achieved median DockQ scores of ~0.636 (class I) and ~0.679 (class II) on the 70-complex TCR-pMHC benchmark β€” useful to compare methodological performance (structure prediction confidence) against repertoire-scale metrics above.


    Key takeaways (visual-first):

    • Single-cell spatial and targeted sequencing studies can produce extremely large unique CDR3 counts when aggregated (millions), while bulk RNA-derived repertoires often show low per-sample recoveries (median ~14.5 sequences/patient in TCGA SKCM) β€” sample type and assay matter greatly for diversity metrics ( cited above).
    • Methodological choices (RNA quality, input amounts, PCR cycles) materially shift measured richness; the bulk TCR-Seq methods paper identifies RNA quality as the dominant driver of observed diversity metrics.
    • Benchmarking structure-prediction quality (DockQ) is complementary to repertoire-scale measures: structure prediction confidence (AlphaFold3 DockQ medians) helps interpret functional inferences from TCR sequences when combined with repertoire-scale datasets.

    If you want: I can (A) compute Shannon / Simpson diversity from your uploaded clonotype tables and produce publication-ready multi-panel Plotly figures, or (B) run a deeper meta-analysis across these papers (e.g., diversity vs sequencing depth) using an AI agent.



    Feedback:    

    Updated: March 17, 2026

     Top Data Sources ExportMCP



     Analysis Wizard



    Reading uploaded clonotype tables, computing Shannon/Simpson/Pielou/clonality per sample, and returning a CSV and Plotly-ready JSON for multi-panel visualization using the referenced datasets.



     Science Art


    Create Graphs: TCR Diversity Metrics Comparison Science Art

     Science Movie



    Make a narrated HD Science movie for this answer ($32 per minute)




     Discussion


    Stay current without chasing every paper.

    Know what changed, what holds up, and what remains uncertain. Every Friday. No ads.


    My BGPT