Inspect an author's raw data, methods, and reproducibility across their publications.
Press Enter β΅ to find
Fuel Your Discoveries
"The most beautiful experience we can have is the mysterious. It is the fundamental emotion that stands at the cradle of true art and true science."
- Albert Einstein
Quick Explanation
Copied
Concise assessment of Xiangyu Ye
Xiangyu Ye appears in multiple domains (genetic epidemiology, movement ecology, computational methods, and bioengineering) with peer-reviewed contributions including a 2025 Genome Medicine PGS platform paper and a 2021 human HBV genetics study; strengths include interdisciplinary collaboration, use of appropriate methods for each domain, and reproducible code/data links for several projects, but notable limits are uneven sample sizes in some studies, limited functional validation (in human genetics), and variable author-level citation metrics across name-homonyms that complicate attribution
Key sources: PGSFusion webserver (PGSFusion) and an HBV RLR polymorphism case-control study
Long Explanation
Author Review: Xiangyu Ye
Executive summary
Across the corpus provided, Xiangyu Ye is a multi-disciplinary coauthor appearing on studies spanning polygenic score tooling, human genetic association, movement ecology/genomics of birds, high-density surface EMG biometrics, quantum/MM photosynthesis modelling contributions (different name variants may exist). The strongest, high-quality contributions in the dataset are the PGSFusion platform (Genome Medicine; methods/software emphasis) and the large multidisciplinary preprints on ecology/genomics and infection-driven cancer biology where Ye is a coauthor; the HBV genetics paper is a moderate-sized, focused human genetics study that is methodologically conventional but limited by sample size and lack of functional follow-up. Each claim below cites the primary source text.
Detailed evidence synthesis
1) Research domains and representative works
PGS and population genetics tooling: PGSFusion (Genome Medicine 2025) documents a webserver integrating multiple PGS methods, UK Biobank-based evaluation, and publicly available code and pipeline links; authorship list includes Xiangyu Ye as a contributing author and affiliation in Nanjing Medical University contexts
Human host genetics / viral clearance: RIG-I-like receptor SNPs and HBV clearance (Journal of Medical Virology 2021) β observational case-control genotyping (n=851 total) finding allele associations for DDX58, DHX58, IFIH1 with spontaneous HBV clearance, but no functional assays were performed and authors note single-ethnicity sampling limits
Movement ecology and population genomics: Asian stonechat migratory-genomic study (2025 preprint) β whole-genome sequencing (77 samples), geolocator tracking (115 loggers deployed; limited recovered tracks), Admixture, PCA, triangle plots; strong integration of movement and genomics but limited by incomplete geographic sampling and modest recovery rates for trackers
Applied bioengineering biometrics: HD-sEMG cancelable biometric authentication (IEEE IoT Journal 2021) β small human study (n=20) with strong engineering methods (256-channel HD-sEMG arrays, RF classifiers) showing low cross-day EER but constrained to lab settings
Other coauthorships and name ambiguity: multiple OpenAlex and author-identity records (several Xiangyu Ye / Ye Xiangyu variants) indicate that care is needed attributing metrics to a unique person; OpenAlex indices show several distinct authors with similar names and widely different h-indices and work counts (some high, some low), complicating simple citation-metric claims (see citation below)
2) Technical and methodological quality
Strengths
Appropriate methods for each field: PGSFusion implements many standard, peer-reviewed PGS algorithms and uses UK Biobank splits for evaluation (good engineering and epidemiological practice)
Integration of orthogonal data types: the stonechat study integrates movement-tracking and whole-genome sequencing β best practice for eco-genomics hypotheses linking phenotype (migration) to genotype
Transparent software/data pipelines where available: PGSFusion GitHub and Snakemake pipelines are referenced for reproducibility; stonechat project links variant-calling pipeline and triangulaR for hybrid analyses (good for reproducibility)
Weaknesses and limitations
Small or unbalanced samples in some empirical studies: the HBV genetics paper has only 82 spontaneous clearance cases versus 601 carriers and 168 CHB patients β borderline power for modest-effect SNPs and multiple-testing; authors themselves call for replication and functional work
Limited functional mechanistic follow-up in human genetics: associated variants in RLR genes are plausible but the study did not provide wet-lab validation (e.g., expression, reporter assays, or CRISPR perturbations), leaving causal inference incomplete
Tracking sample recovery rates: the stonechat study deployed 115 geolocators but recovered only ~16 complete tracks β this limits the power for movement-genotype correlations and raises representativeness concerns
3) Reproducibility and openness
Code and pipeline availability are strengths: PGSFusion GitHub repository and stonechat variant-calling Snakemake reference (gmanthey/variant-calling v1.0) are provided, improving reproducibility prospects
Data deposition varied: PGSFusion uses UK Biobank (accessible with application) and publishes code; stonechat geolocator data reference is provided (Movebank DOI) but full genomic deposit timing is pending; HBV study data are available on request only β mixed openness profile across projects
4) Authorship attribution and citation metric caveat
Name homonymy: OpenAlex and author-record snapshots indicate multiple distinct researchers named Xiangyu Ye or variants with widely different h-indexes and publication counts; therefore automated metrics risk misattribution unless ORCID or institutional disambiguation is used. The provided OpenAlex aggregation shows records ranging from low to high h_index values; treat simple h-index claims with caution and use ORCID or full-author-record matching for accuracy
Conclusions and scientific strength judgment
Overall, the body of work associated (in the provided dataset) with Xiangyu Ye shows interdisciplinary engagement, competent application of appropriate methods for each domain, and an emphasis on software/pipeline openness in several projects β these are evidence of solid scientific practice. Weaknesses are typical of interdisciplinary mid-career contributors: variable sample sizes, occasional limited mechanistic follow-up (human genetic associations), and author-name disambiguation challenges that complicate metric-based judgments. The strongest single outputs in terms of methodological rigor and reuse potential are the PGSFusion platform and the stonechat movement-genomics integration (both score high for data/method transparency); domain-limited studies (HBV SNP associations, HD-sEMG biometrics) are solid but constrained by scope and sample size.
Actionable next steps and recommendations for the author
For association studies: add functional validation (expression QTL checks, reporter assays, CRISPR perturbations) to move from association to mechanism.
For movement-genomics studies: increase geolocator recovery effort, expand geographic sampling (Mongolia, Central Asia), and deposit genomes with metadata linked to tracking to enable independent genotypeβphenotype analyses.
For software/platform papers: include standardized benchmarking scripts and containerized environments and promote ORCID linking for all authors to prevent homonym confusion.
Useful links and tools
PGSFusion GitHub: https://github.com/biostat0903/PGSFusion and PGSFusion webserver (paper)
Primary sources cited in this review
Feedback:
Updated: November 20, 2025
BGPT Author Review
Scientific Quality
70%
Based on the provided corpus, the author demonstrates solid methodological competence across disciplines, contributes to reproducible software/pipeline projects, and participates in substantial collaborative, well-executed studies; weaknesses include some small empirical sample sizes, limited mechanistic follow-up in association studies, and name-disambiguation issues that hinder clear bibliometric evaluation.
Communication Quality
80%
Written outputs and coauthored papers are generally clear, use standard methodological descriptions, and provide code/data links where appropriate; the PGSFusion and stonechat papers are well-documented and reproducible, while the HBV paper is concise and standard β communication is effective for technical audiences.
Author Novelty
70%
Novelty is moderate-to-high in integrating movement ecology with genomics and in building user-friendly PGS tooling; human genetics work is incremental (SNP associations), while biometrics and software work contain original engineering advances.
Scientific Rigor
70%
Rigor is generally good: methods match questions (Admixture/PCA for genomics; TaqMan genotyping with QC for SNP study; extensive software documentation for PGSFusion). Some studies are limited by sample size or lack of functional follow-up; reproducibility is strengthened where code/data are provided.
Preparing reproducible pipelines that download provided genomic VCFs, filter SNPs (MAF, LD), compute PCA and Admixture inputs, and output triangle plots and ancestryβphenotype association tables using the stonechat dataset and PGS reference splits.
Get emailed when your analysis is done!
We'll email you the results when your analysis is finished.
Hypothesis Graveyard
All migratory-route differences are purely learned and uncorrelated with genotype β falsified because the stonechat study shows genomic structure correlating with migratory clusters and hybrids showing intermediate routes.
RLR SNPs alone explain HBV clearance variability β unlikely because the HBV study reports modest ORs and the authors acknowledge the need for broader genetic and functional follow-up.
Fuel Your Discoveries
Quick Explanation
Long Explanation
Top Data Sources
Ask a Follow-Up
Key Insight
Keep Exploring
Analysis 
Hypothesis Graveyard
Potential Experiments
Discussion