Check Claims Before You Publish

 Quick Explanation Copied

 Long Explanation

What the evidence shows about this author's work

The single supplied full-text record is Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Between Profit and Ethics (2017, Jurnal Wira Ekonomi Mikroskil), a narrative review in Indonesian covering CSRD concepts (Carroll's pyramid, Visser's developing-country pyramid, GRI categories), determinants, and disclosure rates CSRD narrative review, Jurnal Wira Ekonomi Mikroskil. It reports no new empirical analysis: disclosure rates (24% Saudi Arabia, 46.8% UK manufacturing, ~30% Indonesian public firms, 41% LQ45 firms) are all secondhand from prior studies (Habbash 2016; Adeneye & Ahmed 2015), and causal claims about governance determinants are relayed from Sadia Majeed et al. (2015) All five evidence units are secondhand claims.

Caveat: these bars compare heterogeneous studies (different disclosure indices, sectors, timeframes); cross-country comparison is weakly valid — an over-generalization risk the review itself does not address.

Bibliometric footprint and identity ambiguity

OpenAlex lists multiple authors named "Maryam Majeed," making attribution uncertain. The most likely matches are a profile with 54 works, 244 citations, h-index 9, and another ("Maryam Majeed Abdullah") with 33 works, 755 citations, h-index 10; neither lists a primary institution, and the CSR/accounting field is not clearly assigned to either profile — several namesakes are in materials science or medicine OpenAlex author profiles for Maryam Majeed. The reviewed paper has zero recorded incoming citations and no funding or conflict-of-interest statement Low-impact metadata: no citations, no funding, no COI.

What would change this assessment

Verified ORCID linkage of the paper to a specific OpenAlex profile, primary empirical work (panel regressions on GRI-standardized indicators) by this author, and independent citations of the review would materially raise the score. The falsification pathway proposed — standardized GRI indicator testing with regression on panel data — is sound but was not executed by the author Proposed but unexecuted falsification pathway.

 BGPT Author Review

Scientific Quality

Based on one verifiable output: a narrative review with no primary data, no statistical testing, no effect sizes, zero indexed incoming citations, published in a regional Indonesian journal. The synthesis is competent at a descriptive level but adds no new methods or empirical evidence; causal claims are relayed secondhand without critical appraisal of study quality. Identity ambiguity further limits verifiable track record.

Communication Quality

The review is organized (concepts, theory, country evidence, recommendations) and clearly written for its audience, but mixes Indonesian and English sources without full critical synthesis, and the recommendation for mandatory regulation is asserted rather than derived from a weighted analysis of the voluntary-vs-mandatory evidence.

Author Novelty

A conventional literature review of well-trodden CSR determinants (governance, ownership, firm size, age) with Carroll/Visser/GRI frameworks; no new theory, method, or dataset. The Indonesia framing is locally useful but not conceptually novel.

Scientific Rigor

No systematic review protocol, no inclusion criteria, no quality appraisal of the 5+ relayed studies, heterogeneous cross-country comparisons presented without caveats, no effect sizes or uncertainty reported, and reproducibility is very low (scored 2/10 in extraction). The policy recommendation outpaces the strength of the secondhand evidence.