Why BGPT?
logo

Check Claims Before You Publish

See how your reported results read as versioned evidence records — linked to experiments and limitations.Know what the science actually supports before you trust the answer.

Press Enter ↵ to review claims


     Quick Explanation



    Concise author snapshot — Kei Yura (critical)

    Available metadata show two distinct profiles named "Kei Yura": one identifiable, highly‑published computational/biological scientist in OpenAlex (works_count=229, cited_by_count=2849, h_index=29) and multiple high‑impact coauthored papers (example: a 2004 PLoS Biology integrative human gene annotation paper) — and a separate record provided by you with single paper, 0 citations, h‑index 0. The coexistence of these two name‑matches creates a high risk of misattribution; treat the low‑metric single‑paper record as a distinct, low‑visibility author unless ORCID/institutional disambiguation confirms identity.

    Key evidence: OpenAlex aggregated author profile and a representative high‑impact paper by the well‑published Kei Yura




     Long Explanation



    Author Review — Kei Yura

    Top-level conclusion (visual first): name disambiguation explains the apparent contradiction between a high-impact researcher and a near-zero citation record.

    Evidence reviewed

    • OpenAlex aggregated author profile for an author id with ORCID (https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0197-5478) showing extensive publication record: works_count = 229, cited_by_count = 2849, h_index = 29 — several well‑cited papers in biology/computational biology (selected top work shown below)
    • User-supplied author metadata: single paper titled "A Trial for the Development of Math-Science Educational Materials on the Internet" with paper count=1, citations=0, h-index=0 (provided by user). No DOI or institutional affiliation supplied for this record — this low-visibility record may be a distinct person or a non-research/educational output. (No external DOI available from user metadata.)

    Critical analysis (strengths, weaknesses, blindspots)

    1. Strong evidence of an established scientist with this name: The OpenAlex profile plus several medium/highly cited journal items (PLoS Biology, Nucleic Acids Research, JBC, Science coauthorships shown in OpenAlex snapshot) indicate a robust research identity for at least one individual named "Kei Yura"
    2. Low-visibility record likely distinct: The user-supplied record (1 paper, 0 citations, h-index 0) lacks DOI/affiliation and appears to be either a different person with identical name or a non‑scholarly/educational contribution. This creates a high probability of mistaken attribution if one treats name-string matches as identity. No direct DOI found for the single paper in your metadata, reducing verifiability.
    3. Name-disambiguation risk: Multiple OpenAlex matches for "Kei Yura" (several author ids with 0–229 works) show how bibliographic databases can split or conflate identities; ORCID presence (0000-0003-0197-5478) in the high-metrics OpenAlex entry is a strong disambiguator for that identity; absence of ORCID in the low-metric record keeps it ambiguous. Treat bibliometric claims conservatively and seek ORCID/institutional pages to disambiguate.
    4. Potential biases and limits: OpenAlex aggregates and sometimes merges records; coauthorship on large consortium papers can increase citation counts that reflect team efforts rather than sole-author impact — measure contribution by position, corresponding author status, and subject-matter instead of raw counts alone. Also watch for publication type (book chapters, conference proceedings, educational reports) that inflate 'works_count' without equal scholarly impact.

    Practical recommendations

    • Confirm identity: check ORCID (if available), institutional webpage, or the full text of the user-supplied paper to establish whether the single low‑citation paper is the same person as the OpenAlex high-metric author.
    • Verify DOIs and affiliations for the user-supplied paper; if none exist, classify it as an educational/technical report rather than a peer-reviewed research output.
    • If you want disambiguation, I can run a detailed author‑disambiguation search (ORCID, Scopus, PubMed, institutional pages) and fetch the primary full-texts; click the Run AI Scientist button below to start that workflow.

    Representative citation used

    OpenAlex lists this PLoS Biology 2004 article among the top works for the ORCID-linked Kei Yura author profile, supporting the existence of a prolific researcher with that name:



    Feedback:    

    Updated: March 17, 2026

     BGPT Author Review



    Scientific Quality

    70%

    Evidence points to at least one scientifically productive, mid-career to senior researcher named Kei Yura (multiple peer-reviewed papers, h-index ~29, contributions to genomics/structural bioinformatics), indicating solid scientific capability; however, name-disambiguation issues and reliance on coauthorship in large multi-author projects reduce confidence in assigning sole-author expertise without ORCID/affiliation confirmation.



    Communication Quality

    60%

    Based on available sample papers (multi-author research articles and reviews), communication appears adequate for specialist audiences (peer‑reviewed journals), but without access to the specific single paper you provided I cannot judge clarity for that work; variability across outputs and possible educational material suggests mixed communication strengths.



    Author Novelty

    60%

    Contributions include computational/structural-bioinformatics and genomic annotation, which are important but largely incremental within established fields; presence on diverse topics (gene annotation, protein–RNA interface rules, replication origins) shows breadth rather than radical novelty.



    Scientific Rigor

    70%

    Publication in reputable, peer-reviewed journals (PLoS Biology, Nucleic Acids Research, JBC, Science coauthorship) implies standard scientific rigor; however, assessing experimental design and reproducibility for specific papers would require full-text inspection and methodology review.

     Analysis Wizard



    Preparing an ORCID+title-based author-disambiguation script to match publications, affiliations, and DOIs to determine whether two records represent the same individual.



     Science Art


    Author Review: Kei Yura Science Art

     Science Movie



    Make a narrated HD Science movie for this answer ($32 per minute)




     Discussion


    Stay current without chasing every paper.

    Know what changed, what holds up, and what remains uncertain. Every Friday. No ads.


    My BGPT