BGPT: Author Review: Compare citation trajectories of Linhai He vs Huihui Chen on OpenAlex

Explore by Goal

Quick Explanation Copied

The supplied evidence contains no OpenAlex author-level data for either Linhai He or Huihui Chen, so no evidence-based comparison of their citation trajectories is possible; retrieving both author records directly from OpenAlex would be required.

Long Explanation

No Author-Level Evidence Available

The supplied sources cover database-level bibliometrics: OpenAlex coverage versus commercial databases, retraction indexing, field-normalized citation comparability, and journal-level network workflows. None contains publication counts, citations, or yearly trajectories for the authors Linhai He or Huihui Chen (OpenAlex author IDs are never mentioned). Author-level bibliometric comparisons do show that OpenAlex metrics can differ materially from Scopus/WoS at the individual level , and no single database captures a complete citation network . Any trajectory comparison therefore requires querying OpenAlex author entities directly; without those records I cannot state which author has higher citations, output, or growth, and I will not fabricate values.

Feedback:

Updated: October 26, 2026

Top Data Sources Export MCP

1. Extends an OpenAlex-to-Pajek workflow to automatically assemble and analyze journal-level bibliographic networks from OpenAlex data, demonstrated on Slovenian journals Advances in Methodology and Statistics / Metodološki zvezki (AMS/MZ) and Ars Mathematica Contemporanea (AMC) to reveal citation and authorship structures. [2026]

8QualityResults Limitations Context Blindspots Methods Sample Conflict Data

↗ Paper Review ↗ Full Paper

2. OpenAlex provides substantially larger coverage than Web of Science or Scopus for Argentina–Spain coauthored articles (2013–2023), revealing biases of relying on a single commercial index and showing that combining OpenAlex with open data sources yields a broader, more diverse view of international scientific collaboration. [2025]

7QualityResults Limitations Methods Sample Data

↗ Paper Review ↗ Full Paper

3. Coverage across seven bibliographic databases shows non-selective databases index more retracted literature than venue-restricted ones, with OpenAlex, Scilit, and Web of Science together covering about 99% of the sample, underscoring the need to query multiple sources to map retractions accurately. [2024]

8QualityResults Limitations Context Blindspots Methods Sample Conflict Data

↗ Paper Review ↗ Full Paper

4. Diamond OA journals are far less covered by major bibliographic databases than gold OA journals, and diamond journals are more linguistically and geographically diverse, based on a cross-database analysis of DOAJ-indexed journals in OpenAlex, Web of Science, and Scopus. [2025]

9QualityResults Limitations Context Blindspots Methods Sample Data

↗ Paper Review ↗ Full Paper

5. OpenAlex indexes far more nursing journals than Scopus or Web of Science and yields higher article-level citations, but OpenAlex’s open-access coverage lags and its interface is API-based rather than user-friendly. [2025]

7QualityResults Limitations Context Blindspots Methods Sample Conflict Data

↗ Paper Review ↗ Full Paper

Keep Exploring

How do OpenAlex author-disambiguation errors (split or merged author IDs) bias citation-trajectory comparisons for common Chinese names like Linhai He and Huihui Chen?

How would field-normalized citation scores change the interpretation of raw citation trajectories when comparing authors from different disciplines?

How large are OpenAlex versus Scopus citation-count discrepancies for individual authors in biomedical versus mathematics fields?

Analysis Wizard

Querying the OpenAlex authors API by name, disambiguating candidate records, and extracting per-year cited_by_count series to compare citation trajectories of Linhai He and Huihui Chen.

Science Movie

Make a narrated HD Science movie for this answer ($32 per minute)

Discussion

BGPT Bias

I default to refusing synthesis when primary author-level data are absent, which protects accuracy but may underdeliver compared with offering preliminary estimates.

Stay current without chasing every paper.

Know what changed, what holds up, and what remains uncertain. Every Friday. No ads.

Check Your Claims Before Reviewers Do

Verify your claims against versioned evidence records with exact reported results and sources.Know what the science actually supports before you trust the answer.

Explore by Goal

Quick Explanation Copied

Long Explanation

No Author-Level Evidence Available

Top Data Sources Export MCP

4. Diamond OA journals are far less covered by major bibliographic databases than gold OA journals, and diamond journals are more linguistically and geographically diverse, based on a cross-database analysis of DOAJ-indexed journals in OpenAlex, Web of Science, and Scopus. [2025]

5. OpenAlex indexes far more nursing journals than Scopus or Web of Science and yields higher article-level citations, but OpenAlex’s open-access coverage lags and its interface is API-based rather than user-friendly. [2025]

6. Cross-database bibliometric analysis shows adding Scopus to OpenAlex and Web of Science uncovers more missing citations and reveals persistent inconsistencies across major databases, underscoring that no single platform fully captures a paper's citation network. [2025]

7. Diamond OA journals are largely underindexed in Web of Science and Scopus but well represented in OpenAlex, highlighting the smaller, geographically diverse nature of diamond OA and the need for inclusive indexing to support open access. [2024]

10. A practical, example-driven guide to querying the OpenAlex API from R using the openalexR package. [2024]

13. GSM-ALEX_data integrates Google Scholar Metrics and OpenAlex and matched 2,752 of 3,070 Latin American and Caribbean journal titles (90%), outperforming Gsm_hdata by 450 titles. [2025]

15. OpenAlex Level 0 – Art exhibits pronounced hierarchical and semantic flaws that impair indexing accuracy, prompting structural redesigns to improve retrieval and usability. [2025]

16. A Data Warehouse/Data Vault pipeline integrating OpenAlex, OpenAIRE, and COAR produced a unified UNLP publication table with 14,886 DOI-matched records and consolidated citation, download, view, and resource-type metrics. [2026]

17. Bibliometric analysis of 1809 polysomnography articles in otorhinolaryngology journals (1995-2025) shows sustained output growth and high cross-database citation correlation but systematic WoS citation undercount. [2026]

18. ProLiVis 2.0 is a browser-based PPI network tool that scores interaction evidence with a seven-term citation-trust model and deterministic layout; on BioGRID 5.0.260, 70% of SARS-CoV-2 interactions rest on a single publication. [2026]

Ask a Follow-Up

Keep Exploring

How do OpenAlex author-disambiguation errors (split or merged author IDs) bias citation-trajectory comparisons for common Chinese names like Linhai He and Huihui Chen?

How would field-normalized citation scores change the interpretation of raw citation trajectories when comparing authors from different disciplines?

How large are OpenAlex versus Scopus citation-count discrepancies for individual authors in biomedical versus mathematics fields?

Analysis Wizard

Querying the OpenAlex authors API by name, disambiguating candidate records, and extracting per-year cited_by_count series to compare citation trajectories of Linhai He and Huihui Chen.

Science Movie

Make a narrated HD Science movie for this answer ($32 per minute)

Discussion

BGPT Bias

I default to refusing synthesis when primary author-level data are absent, which protects accuracy but may underdeliver compared with offering preliminary estimates.

Stay current without chasing every paper.

My BGPT

Trending

Check Your Claims Before Reviewers Do

Verify your claims against versioned evidence records with exact reported results and sources.Know what the science actually supports before you trust the answer.

Explore by Goal

Quick Explanation Copied

Long Explanation

No Author-Level Evidence Available

Top Data Sources ExportMCP

4. Diamond OA journals are far less covered by major bibliographic databases than gold OA journals, and diamond journals are more linguistically and geographically diverse, based on a cross-database analysis of DOAJ-indexed journals in OpenAlex, Web of Science, and Scopus. [2025]

5. OpenAlex indexes far more nursing journals than Scopus or Web of Science and yields higher article-level citations, but OpenAlex’s open-access coverage lags and its interface is API-based rather than user-friendly. [2025]

6. Cross-database bibliometric analysis shows adding Scopus to OpenAlex and Web of Science uncovers more missing citations and reveals persistent inconsistencies across major databases, underscoring that no single platform fully captures a paper's citation network. [2025]

7. Diamond OA journals are largely underindexed in Web of Science and Scopus but well represented in OpenAlex, highlighting the smaller, geographically diverse nature of diamond OA and the need for inclusive indexing to support open access. [2024]

10. A practical, example-driven guide to querying the OpenAlex API from R using the openalexR package. [2024]

13. GSM-ALEX_data integrates Google Scholar Metrics and OpenAlex and matched 2,752 of 3,070 Latin American and Caribbean journal titles (90%), outperforming Gsm_hdata by 450 titles. [2025]

15. OpenAlex Level 0 – Art exhibits pronounced hierarchical and semantic flaws that impair indexing accuracy, prompting structural redesigns to improve retrieval and usability. [2025]

16. A Data Warehouse/Data Vault pipeline integrating OpenAlex, OpenAIRE, and COAR produced a unified UNLP publication table with 14,886 DOI-matched records and consolidated citation, download, view, and resource-type metrics. [2026]

17. Bibliometric analysis of 1809 polysomnography articles in otorhinolaryngology journals (1995-2025) shows sustained output growth and high cross-database citation correlation but systematic WoS citation undercount. [2026]

18. ProLiVis 2.0 is a browser-based PPI network tool that scores interaction evidence with a seven-term citation-trust model and deterministic layout; on BioGRID 5.0.260, 70% of SARS-CoV-2 interactions rest on a single publication. [2026]

Ask a Follow-Up

Keep Exploring

How do OpenAlex author-disambiguation errors (split or merged author IDs) bias citation-trajectory comparisons for common Chinese names like Linhai He and Huihui Chen?

How would field-normalized citation scores change the interpretation of raw citation trajectories when comparing authors from different disciplines?

How large are OpenAlex versus Scopus citation-count discrepancies for individual authors in biomedical versus mathematics fields?

Analysis Wizard

Querying the OpenAlex authors API by name, disambiguating candidate records, and extracting per-year cited_by_count series to compare citation trajectories of Linhai He and Huihui Chen.

Science Movie

Make a narrated HD Science movie for this answer ($32 per minute)

Discussion

BGPT Bias

I default to refusing synthesis when primary author-level data are absent, which protects accuracy but may underdeliver compared with offering preliminary estimates.

Stay current without chasing every paper.

My BGPT

Trending

Top Data Sources Export MCP