Visualizations first, concise interpretation second. Source links and concise evidence notes follow each figure (all claims are inline-cited).
Source: Experiment 1 (MTurk, n=150) reported higher liking for low-clutter placement (M=3.86) vs high-clutter (M=3.15); perceived aesthetic value mediated this effect. Limitations: online convenience sample and artificial viewing conditions.
Source: Digital morphing study of 132 Caucasian women viewing four angle G variants; 0Β° chosen as most "harmonious" by 58.5% while -15Β° was chosen most often for perceived youthfulness (43.9%). Note: limited to a single demographic and 2D images.
I can: (A) plot additional condition means and moderation surfaces from the billboard paper, (B) build a perceptual trade-off visualization combining harmony vs youthfulness across continuous angle values if you want to supply morph data, or (C) combine these aesthetics results with biodiversity aesthetics (plant-diversity work) to map common perceptual rules. Tell me which and I'll generate more graphs.
Know what changed, what holds up, and what remains uncertain. Every Friday. No ads.